Robert Treat wrote:
> > > In other words, before we take a vote on whether the bike shed should be
> > > red, we should first check to see if we can afford red paint.
> > >
> > > Such a proposal should also include other options like Ron Mayer's very
> > > sensible 20-minute solution (e.g. "Postgres and Postgre are acceptable
> > > alternate names").
> >
> > OK, looks like we now have a list of items to address _if_ we change the
> > name:
> >
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Postgres
> >
> > I believe the next step we discussed was to get feedback from the
> > 'general' email list. Correct?
>
> I'd say no. Someone should talk to the packagers to asses viability, and
> someone should review domain names, to asses viability. If those seem viable,
> then open it up. If not, people need to know before they decide.
Are you saying we should ask the packagers email list? I don't see any
other way to ask them.
I heard we were OK with domain names.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
