Re: Barcelona vs Tigerton - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Decibel!
Subject Re: Barcelona vs Tigerton
Date
Msg-id 20070911230022.GH38801@decibel.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Barcelona vs Tigerton  ("Mindaugas" <ml@kilimas.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:57:43AM +0300, Mindaugas wrote:
>   Hello,
>
>   Now that both 4x4 out it's time for us to decide which one should be better for our PostgreSQL and Oracle. And
especiallyfor Oracle we really need such server to squeeze everything from Oracle licenses. Both of the databases
handleOLTP type of the load. 

You might take a look at replacing Oracle with EnterpriseDB... but I'm a
bit biased. ;)

>   Since we plan to buy 4U HP DL580 or 585 and only very few of them so power ratings are not very critical in this
ourcase. 
>
>   First benchmarks (http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=3091) show that Intel still has more raw CPU power but
Barcelonascales much better and also has better memory bandwidth which I believe is quite critical with 16 cores and DB
usagepattern. 
>   On the other hand Intel's X7350 (2.93GHz) has almost 50% advantage in CPU frequency against 2GHz Barcelona.

Databases are all about bandwidth and latency. Compute horsepower almost
never matters.

The only reason I'd look at the clock rate is if it substantially
affects memory IO capability; but from what I've seen, memory seems to
be fairly independent of CPU frequency now-a-days, so I don't think
there's a huge difference there.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby                        decibel@decibel.org
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)

Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Decibel!
Date:
Subject: Re: [Again] Postgres performance problem
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: random_page_costs - are defaults of 4.0 realistic for SCSI RAID 1