Re: execl() sentinel - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: execl() sentinel
Date
Msg-id 200707181659.36341.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: execl() sentinel  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: execl() sentinel  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: execl() sentinel  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-patches
Am Mittwoch, 18. Juli 2007 16:16 schrieb Tom Lane:
> You should *not* have to inform the machine that NULL is a pointer.

For variadic functions, that expectation is invalid, AFAIK.

It might be good to check the actual definition of NULL in this case, however,
before wondering further.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: execl() sentinel
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: docfix - DELETE doesn't affect auto-analyze