Re: what is difference between LOCAL and GLOBAL TEMP TABLES in PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: what is difference between LOCAL and GLOBAL TEMP TABLES in PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 200707031549.l63Fn5W25742@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: what is difference between LOCAL and GLOBAL TEMP TABLES in PostgreSQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: what is difference between LOCAL and GLOBAL TEMP TABLES in PostgreSQL
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Tom Lane escribi�:
> >> I rather doubt that.  The most likely implementation would involve
> >> cloning a "template" entry into pg_class.
> 
> > How about a new relkind which causes the table to be located in
> > PGDATA/base/<dboid>/pg_temp_<backendid>/<relfilenode>
> > So each backend can have its own copy of the table with the same
> > relfilenode; there's no need for extra catalog entries.
> 
> Uh-huh.  And what do you do with relpages, reltuples, relfrozenxid, and
> pg_statistic entries?  What if one backend wants to TRUNCATE or CLUSTER
> its copy (requiring a new relfilenode)?  Where does ALTER TABLE fit into
> this?

And what is the use-case for this functionality?  What does it give us
that we don't already have?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: In-Place upgrade concept
Next
From: Naz Gassiep
Date:
Subject: Re: todo: Hash index creation