Karl Wright wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Karl Wright wrote:
> >>I am afraid that I did answer this. My largest tables are the ones
> >>continually being updated. The smaller ones are updated only
> >>infrequently.
> >
> >Can you afford to vacuum them in parallel?
>
> Hmm, interesting question. If VACUUM is disk limited then it wouldn't
> help, probably, unless I moved various tables to different disks
> somehow. Let me think about whether that might be possible.
Well, is it disk limited? Do you have the vacuum_delay stuff enabled?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.flickr.com/photos/alvherre/
"I would rather have GNU than GNOT." (ccchips, lwn.net/Articles/37595/)