On Fri, 18 May 2007 01:29:56 -0400
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> > I do not run any Postgres-related training shops or businesses so I do
> > not have any vested interests in promoting it, beyond simply loving
> > the product, so feel free to take this suggestion with a grain of
> > salt. I won't be surprised :)
>
> I'm curious... you seem to have bridged the cpanel/postgres gap, have you
> emailed your vendor with a list of changes they need to integrate into thier
> product? Have you gotten any response from them?
>
> I've said this before to people and it's true, this is not a problem we can
> fix because cpanel is a commercial application, you need to put pressure on
> the cpanel people. If they need changes in PostgreSQL we can look at that,
> but without them working on this problem it is never going to change.
I agree. and, FWIW, Plesk also supports PosgreSQL ( at least since 8.x )...
as to the 'PGSQL being hard to manage remotely'... i dont' know what you are
on. Any system that has been locked down properly (or defaults to locked down)
will have to be reconfigured to move off the default state. I really don't see
how pgsql is any harder for plesk or cpanel to support than mysql,other than ,
as you say, they've been paid to do it.
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity."
Dennis Ritchie
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
