Re: Managing the community information stream - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: Managing the community information stream
Date
Msg-id 20070508145001.GH2735@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Managing the community information stream  (Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>)
Responses Re: Managing the community information stream  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: Managing the community information stream  (Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>)
Re: Managing the community information stream  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 07:36:55AM -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:

> Instead, if all feature requests are tracked then users can vote on  
> what's most important to them.

I am sympathetic to the issues you and Andrew are describing (I
understand Bruce's stream analogy, but I think Andrew is right that
from the user's point of view, it's not usable).  But I am not
convinced that users voting on desired features will get us the
users' desired features.  The features we get are mostly the features
that have attracted developers.  The method by which that attraction
happens is interesting, but I don't think it's democratic.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
Information security isn't a technological problem.  It's an economics
problem.    --Bruce Schneier


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lukas Kahwe Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature lists for 8.3 and 8.4
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory