Re: New idea for patch tracking - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: New idea for patch tracking
Date
Msg-id 200705051740070000@698317245
Whole thread Raw
In response to New idea for patch tracking  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: New idea for patch tracking  (Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>)
List pgsql-hackers

> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
> To: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
> Sent: 05/05/07, 11:06:37
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New idea for patch tracking
> 
> > <snip tracker outline>
> > 
> > Barring a few trivial details, that sounds almost identical to what I
> > proposed.
> 
> Well, Andrew says everyone he talks to doesn't want it.  They want a
> more comprehensive solution that goes from bug to patch.
> 

I don't recall him saying that, though I do know  that's /his/ opinion. It's certainly *not* the opinion of most of the
peopleI've spoken with.
 

I don't disagree with the idea in principle though, but I don't believe it will work for us because it's so
fundamentallydifferent from the way we currently work and still wouldn't solve the problem of capturing all the
relevantdiscussion regarding a given patch (or bug) without a reasonable amount of manual work, or grafting a large
partof what I'm proposing on the side.
 

Regards, Dave


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch Status in the wiki
Next
From: Zdenek Kotala
Date:
Subject: Re: Integer datetimes