Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
Date
Msg-id 20070418150009.GC7356@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 April 2007 21:25, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I think that is too strong an assumption, which is why I'm planning to
> > back-patch the change to reset statement_timeout to 0 on autovacuum till
> > 8.0, as discussed.  I think I should also backpatch the change to set
> > zero_damaged_pages as well (which is not on 8.0 AFAIR).
> 
> <blinks>  Um, can I get a pointer to that thread?  I can't imagine why we 
> would actually want to automatically destroy our data without oversight from 
> a DBA... I must be reading that wrong. 

You are -- I intend to set it to _off_ :-)

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
Next
From: Harvell F
Date:
Subject: Backend Crash