Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
Date
Msg-id 200704181049.06775.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 21:25, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think that is too strong an assumption, which is why I'm planning to
> back-patch the change to reset statement_timeout to 0 on autovacuum till
> 8.0, as discussed.  I think I should also backpatch the change to set
> zero_damaged_pages as well (which is not on 8.0 AFAIR).

<blinks>  Um, can I get a pointer to that thread?  I can't imagine why we 
would actually want to automatically destroy our data without oversight from 
a DBA... I must be reading that wrong. 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: schema creation during initdb
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Can't ri_KeysEqual() consider two nulls as equal?