Re: scan_recycle_buffers - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: scan_recycle_buffers
Date
Msg-id 200704022310.l32NAwh17732@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: scan_recycle_buffers  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: scan_recycle_buffers
List pgsql-patches
Where is the final version of this patch?  What patches are stuck in the
patch moderator queue?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 07:59 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 18:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > > > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 16:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >> We do that anyway; but certainly Simon's patch ought not be injecting
> > > >> an additional one.
> > >
> > > > It should be possible to pass that down from the planner to the
> > > > executor, in certain cases.
> > >
> > > Huh?  See HeapScanDesc->rs_nblocks.
> >
> > Many thanks.
>
> New patch enclosed, implementation as you've requested.
>
> Not ready to apply yet, but good for testing.
>
> COPY command now also uses this hint, to allow test results and
> discussion. Others could also, perhaps needing different values.
>
> --
>   Simon Riggs
>   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com
>

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES support
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: HOT WIP Patch - version 6.3