On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 02:20:01AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito@guitar.ocn.ne.jp> writes:
> > Is this message necessary for setting errno again?
>
> AFAIR we only intended that message as a temporary measure until we'd
> figured out why things seemed to be failing on Windows. If there's no
> longer a need, I'd vote for removing the whole code chunk, not just
> stepping the level down by one. But if you are still seeing it, maybe
> we haven't figured out why the failure?
No, you see it during normal startup - for example, pg_internal.init
does not exist at this time. So don't think it's needed - I'll zap it in
a bit if noone objecst.
//Magnus
