Re: SCMS question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Warren Turkal
Subject Re: SCMS question
Date
Msg-id 200702240024.19990.wt@penguintechs.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SCMS question  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: SCMS question  (Jeremy Drake <pgsql@jdrake.com>)
Re: SCMS question  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question)  (Warren Turkal <wt@penguintechs.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Friday 23 February 2007 17:30, Gregory Stark wrote:
> The distributed systems sound neat and do sound like they match our style
> of working. But they seem like a big leap for a project that's still using
> a buggy unmaintained pile of spaghetti code for fear of change. Subversion
> is the path of least resistance in that nothing has to change, we can
> choose to use new features if we want but otherwise it's basically a CVS
> 2.0 with a new name (and active maintenance).

The interesting thing about Git is that is has two way sync support for a SVN 
repository also. You could run a Git repository pushing changes in real time 
to a SVN repository and present a CVS frontend also. I would like to try 
converting the CVS repository of PostgreSQL to Git and try setting some of 
this stuff up. Does anyone know how I could get the CVS repository files?

wt
-- 
Warren Turkal (w00t)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 5 Weeks till feature freeze or (do you know where your patch is?)
Next
From: Warren Turkal
Date:
Subject: Re: SCMS question