Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Here is a patch further cleaning up dummy process startup and the
> >bootstrap code itself a little.
>
> Could we please call the "dummy" processes something else? Dummy
> seems a bit belittling for such important things like bgwriter and the
> startup process.
>
> How about worker or helper process?
Well, sure, but the name was there before I patched it :-) This is
mostly a code issue though, not something that shows up at all at the
user level.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
