Re: RFC: Temporal Extensions for PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Warren Turkal
Subject Re: RFC: Temporal Extensions for PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 200702171140.44775.wt@penguintechs.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RFC: Temporal Extensions for PostgreSQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: RFC: Temporal Extensions for PostgreSQL  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Saturday 17 February 2007 09:26, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Overlapping" is not an equality relation (it fails the transitive law),
> so I'm not entirely sure what "unique" means in this context ... but I
> can promise you you can't make it work with btree.

There is an equality relation on periods. But it wouldn't really tell you much 
useful info, as it's not normally what you're looking for with time.

wt
-- 
Warren Turkal (w00t)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore fails with a custom backup file
Next
From: Warren Turkal
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Temporal Extensions for PostgreSQL