Re: large object regression tests, take two - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: large object regression tests, take two
Date
Msg-id 200702090225.l192Pr315587@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to large object regression tests, take two  (Jeremy Drake <pgsql@jdrake.com>)
Responses Re: large object regression tests, take two  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-patches
Is this patch ready for application?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jeremy Drake wrote:
> This is the latest version of the large object regression test I have been
> working on.  Note that a prerequisite for this version of the test is the
> patch I made to psql to make it not output on \lo_* commands in quiet mode
> is required (also attached, it's small).
>
> Sorry that it still makes use of the sed trickery like the copy test does,
> but:
>
> 1) I think the server side lo_(import|export) functions need to be tested
> as well as the psql variants
>
> 2) ISTM that making assumptions about the working directory of psql
> during
> the regression tests would open a can of worms, especially wrt VPATH
> builds where the data files could be in a completely separate tree from
> the regression tests.
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Why did the Roman Empire collapse?
> What is the Latin for office automation?
Content-Description:

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

Content-Description:

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: \prompt for psql
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: large object regression tests, take two