Re: pg_ctl options - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_ctl options
Date
Msg-id 200701070114.l071EUX21320@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_ctl options  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: pg_ctl options
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > pg_config would need short ones.
> >
> > Seems we should have some,
> 
> But why?  What is the use case?  It's not like pg_config is a frequently 
> typed command.

I thought consistency.  Why do any of the commands have long and short
options?


--  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dan Langille"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PGCon 2007 Program Committee
Next
From: elein
Date:
Subject: Re: InitPostgres and flatfiles question