Re: pg_ctl options - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pg_ctl options
Date
Msg-id 200701070055.38087.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_ctl options  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_ctl options
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > pg_config would need short ones.
>
> Seems we should have some,

But why?  What is the use case?  It's not like pg_config is a frequently 
typed command.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Vanessa V. González D."
Date:
Subject: Plannode with a righttree
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Allow the identifier length to be increased via a configure option