Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Date
Msg-id 200612270412.kBR4C5P26257@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> I'm not really convinced that Bruce's proposed names seem any better to
> >> me.  What's wrong with "dead" and "live"?
>
> > In my mind, visible really means "visible to anyone", and expired means
> > visible to no one.
>
> Um ... surely, visibility is in the eye of the beholder (no smiley).
>
> I don't have an immediate suggestion for better terminology, but IMHO
> the whole point of visible/invisible terminology is that it depends on
> who's looking.  Dead and live seem to convey a more appropriate air
> of finality.
>
> "Expired" is OK as a synonym for "dead", but there is no thesaurus
> anywhere in the world that will suggest it as an antonym for "visible".

OK, so we need new terminology and we need it to be used consistenly in
our documentation, whatever we choose.

--
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Load distributed checkpoint
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units