Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Date
Msg-id 11314.1167191007@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I'm not really convinced that Bruce's proposed names seem any better to
>> me.  What's wrong with "dead" and "live"?

> In my mind, visible really means "visible to anyone", and expired means
> visible to no one.

Um ... surely, visibility is in the eye of the beholder (no smiley).

I don't have an immediate suggestion for better terminology, but IMHO
the whole point of visible/invisible terminology is that it depends on
who's looking.  Dead and live seem to convey a more appropriate air
of finality.

"Expired" is OK as a synonym for "dead", but there is no thesaurus
anywhere in the world that will suggest it as an antonym for "visible".

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: Bitmap index thoughts
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Load distributed checkpoint