On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 07:50:41AM -0800, Michael Dean wrote:
> indiosyncratic proposals seems somewhat unethical. Perhaps I am wrong,
> but wouldn't it be better if there were a document clearly specifying
> spending priorities that was relatively accepted by consensus of a broad
> group of pg'ers, and that an opportunity to qualify for these monies
> could be promulgated to the broader group?
Now that you have restated exactly my goal for starting this thread,
perhaps we could move on to the substance of the question?
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
A certain description of men are for getting out of debt, yet are
against all taxes for raising money to pay it off.
--Alexander Hamilton
