Tom Lane wrote:
> Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net> writes:
> > I don't think that any of our SGML documentation is actually in UCS-4
> > encoding.
>
> The source files use nothing beyond plain ASCII (and should remain that
> way, IMHO) so there isn't any need to inquire very far into exactly what
> the toolchain thinks the "document encoding" is. The issue at hand here
> is what the *output* character set is, which is to say the "document
> character set" if I have the jargon right. That is the space over which
> we are permitted to use &-entities.
Just for reference, if we could support UTF8, I was hoping to add
non-Latin names as alternates to the ASCII versions, so we could have
Japanese and Russian-lettered names in the release notes. I thought it
would be a nice touch.
-- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
