On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 09:15:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Gregory Stark wrote:
> >> A TODO list people can freely add stuff to is precisely what would make it
> >> useful. It would have things we don't already know.
>
> > I am just going to hope that you are kidding about this one.
>
> Fortunately, none of the real developers would have to pay any attention
> to any such page ... and you can bet they wouldn't.
Well, there is a reason why I put a big label there "Unofficial TODO
List". I tried to make it clear that it's not an official stance of the
project.
If someone wants to spend an afternoon putting up a coherent
description of their wishlist item complete with possible problems and
solutions, then I don't see why we should stop them. The page someone
has put up covering XML told me more about the current state of XML
support in postgres than a few hours of archive searching would.
It's just not official, that doesn't make it any less useful.
Two points I'm not clear about on this thread though:
1. Authorized user: is that someone with an account, or someone who has
been authorized by someone else?
2. I can see the official todo list being in CVS, which gives it all
the access protection it needs. A wiki todo list can stay where it is,
just that it's not official.
[I've just made a reference to the TODO list in CVS from the wiki, that
should help].
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
