Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Both createuser and vacuumdb provide the same feedback as the
> >> corresponding SQL commands.
> >>
> >> The more I think about it, the patch that just went in is an outright
> >> mistake.
>
> > Well, we had a lot of discussion when this patch was posted, and seveal
> > people liked it. I need someone else to say they want it reverted.
>
> I agree with Peter: that patch is a quick hack not a considered solution.
>
> As for "several people said they liked it", where? I don't see even
> one followup to
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-06/msg00049.php
The issue is that the patch was at the end of a thread, and no one said
they didn't like it, and no one said anything when it was placed in the
patch queue. I take that as acceptance.
But now that two people do not like it, patch reverted.
-- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
