Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> > The only part of this that I see as relevant to us is setting of
> > development goals. And we've already discussed this ad nauseum on the
> > Hackers list and AFAIK have an initial plan (the enhanced TODO), lacking
> > only the resources to implement it this month.
>
> Almost the whole thing is relevant :). Keep in mind that I am not saying
I totally agree!
> that it is negative. For example the NetBSD core is obviously cranked,
> where our Core tends to stay out of the way. That is a positive.
>
> On the other hand, we do suffer from the locked project problem (the
> recent recursive query debacle is a perfect example).
Yep, but fortunately this problem doesn't happen to us often.
> Anyway, the post as I said was for provoking thought, not for
> antagonistic measures. I saw good and bad and thought it would be good
> for everyone to review as we are as a project dealing with some of our
> own growth problems.
Yes. There are lessons to be learned.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
