Re: [DOCS] New XML section for documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [DOCS] New XML section for documentation
Date
Msg-id 200608262041.33396.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] New XML section for documentation  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [DOCS] New XML section for documentation  ("Nikolay Samokhvalov" <samokhvalov@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I made it clear in the section that the XML syntax was being checked,
> not validation against a schema.  You want Check and Validation
> sections?

"Valid" and "well-formed" have very specific distinct meanings in XML.
(Note that "check" doesn't have any meaning there.)  We will eventually
want a method to verify both the validity and the well-formedness.

I think that a function called xml_valid checks for well-formedness is
an outright bug and needs to be fixed.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] New XML section for documentation
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] New XML section for documentation