David Fetter wrote:
> We claim SQL standard compliance,
No, we don't. And SQL conformance doesn't require you to implement all
parts anyway.
> so since those are part of
> SQL:2003, we probably ought to mention them. SQL/PSM is a
> programming language that lives inside the database, and DB2 and
> MySQL have it. SQL/MED lets people talk to other data stores.
> SQL/OLB appears to be derived from equel, which we have as ecpg.
> SQL/Schemata contains the information schema. SQL/JRT appears to
> bear some similarity to PL/Java and PL/J.
It's pretty useless to talk about stuff that we don't have yet. The
point of the XML section is that we have a number of things, and users
are having trouble (understandably) fitting them together.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
