Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > I merely said that the way the patch was presented, with significant
> > code refactoring mixed in, I couldn't review it (as effectively as
> > perhaps otherwise). FWIW, I believe that the general approach is
> > sound, but I haven't actually "reviewed" the patch completely.
>
> Given the multiple problems already found, I feel quite uncomfortable
> with putting it back in until another set of eyeballs has been over
> it. Do you have time to do a full review anytime soon? I'm trying
> to deal with all the other stuff in the queue, and so would prefer
> not to spend my own time on it ...
Peter, you also commented on an error message displayed, so I assume
you did look it over somewhat. I agree it would be best for Peter to
review it.
-- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
