Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >Am Montag, 24. Juli 2006 18:49 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
> >>Side question -- is it plRuby or PL/Ruby? We should be consistent. I
> >>just noticed the top-level README file has all the wrong names -- what
> >>is "pl/c" for starters? Or plPgsql? We've _never_ used those names.
> >
> >I'm beginning to think that this is part of some obscure plot by Joshua
> >Drake to confuse people.
>
> I sincerely hope you are kidding.
I understand that he is.
> >I advise all committers not to take any documentation
> >patches from him without careful scrutiny.
>
> Gah... aren't you just all sour grapes. The README was reviewed by
> several people, in fact it went through two versions to the patches list.
I saw those fly by and my gut feeling was "whoever commits this is
_certainly_ going to fix it". I'm not sure why I didn't comment on it.
> Sorry that nobody caught it (including myself), but good lord it isn't
> that big of a deal.
Consistency is important. It may not be _THAT_ big a deal, but we
should be at least a little careful.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
