Re: Transaction Speed - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Enver ALTIN
Subject Re: Transaction Speed
Date
Msg-id 20060721081117.GG21070@alfa147
Whole thread Raw
In response to Transaction Speed  ("moises" <moises@cedaivc.co.cu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:36:53PM +0200, moises wrote:
> For example Inserts, Update, delete, etc.

If you need a storage for structured data, database servers are good to
go. If you need a very fast "flow" of not-so-needed and
okay-to-miss-we-can-regenerate type of data storage you can go with
in-memory storage such as memcache[1] or PostgreSQL's temporary
table[2] feature. I think the latter would slightly perform better.

Enjoy,

[1] http://www.danga.com/memcached/
[2] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/sql-createtable.html
-- 
Enver


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Lor
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: BF Failure on Bandicoot