Re: url for TODO item, is it right? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: url for TODO item, is it right?
Date
Msg-id 200607181909.k6IJ99K15301@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: url for TODO item, is it right?  ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>)
Responses Re: url for TODO item, is it right?  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
[ There is text before PGP section. ]
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2006-07/msg00061.php
> >
> > Yeah.  I think the TODO item is intended to point to what is now
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-02/msg00163.php
> > or one of the earlier messages in that thread.
> 
> This is a very ugly problem. Note that there are also URLs that cannot
> be changed, such as older messages that point to archive posts, and
> many places on the web outside of our control.
> 
> Why can't we just write a script that creates new numbers as needed,
> such as msg00163.1.php and msg00163.2.php? As far as I can tell, there
> is nothing magical about the naming schema itself that would cause
> such URLs to break anything.

Agreed.  It is nice to have the emails numbered in arrival order, but
changes to old URLs are worse.

--  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Luke Lonergan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Progress bar updates
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: url for TODO item, is it right?