Re: url for TODO item, is it right? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Fuhr
Subject Re: url for TODO item, is it right?
Date
Msg-id 20060717053558.GA87861@winnie.fuhr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to url for TODO item, is it right?  ("Jaime Casanova" <systemguards@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: url for TODO item, is it right?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 12:25:09AM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> when searching the TODO list 
> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html).
> 
> i found this on the Monitoring section:
> 
> o Allow protocol-level BIND parameter values to be logged
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-02/msg00165.php
> 
> But i don't understand why that thread is related to the TODO item,
> i'm missing something?

Possibly the message renumbering that Tom griped about:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2006-07/msg00061.php

-- 
Michael Fuhr


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jaime Casanova"
Date:
Subject: url for TODO item, is it right?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: url for TODO item, is it right?