On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 07:29:52AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 July 2006 04:15, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > Absolutely PL/J should be considered in the same light as PL/Java.
> >
> > Consider this a request for PL/J to be included in the core.
>
> Frankly I don't care which one is used, as long as the one (and ONLY one) that
> is included is the most mature and stable.
Are they mutually exclusive? I can imagine, at least for development
purposes, that someone might want to install both.
Cheers,
D
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > On 11-Jul-06, at 12:50 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > David,
> > >
> > >> It's good to integrate things with the core as needed. What plans do
> > >> we have to integrate PL/J?
> > >
> > > None, if the PL/J team doesn't speak up. So far I have yet to see
> > > a request for PL/J or even a release notice.
> > >
> > > --Josh
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of
> > > broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
> --
> === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
> Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
> Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
> http://www.commandprompt.com/
>
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
