Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful
Date
Msg-id 20060711202009.W957@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Greg Stark wrote:

> I have the additional complaint that this doesn't actually solve most of 
> my original complaints and might reduce the pressure to find a better 
> solution. The patches announcements themselves would still be basically 
> invisible within the community.

How do you deal with the case where someone posts a patch, but it isn't an 
attachment?  Its part of the actual text?

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org                              MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: More nuclear options
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: More nuclear options