Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT) - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)
Date
Msg-id 200607021623.k62GNdi08480@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> So this patch was by no stretch of the imagination ready to apply,
> >> but you did it anyway.
>
> > Right.  What is your next question?
>
> Perhaps "why is the buildfarm failing" would be appropriate.

Yes, that is appropriate, though it seems Neil's cleanup of the patch
has fixed it now.  I see only a single stats failure and an initdb
failure in the buildfarm, neither of which I assume are related to the
patch.

--
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ADD/DROPS INHERIT (actually INHERIT / NO INHERIT)