Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Date
Msg-id 20060627161318.GE16840@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?  (Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba@sraoss.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 11:45:53AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> No, it says it occurs if this condition is met: "A single *send* call or
> *WSASend* call fills the whole underlying socket send buffer."
>
> This will surely be true if the buffer sizes are the same. They
> recommend making the socket buffer at least 1 byte bigger.

Ok, but even then, are there any benchmarks to show it makes a
difference. The articles suggests there should be but it would be nice
to see how much difference it makes...

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Rocco Altier"
Date:
Subject: Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC