Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The odds of that syntax getting accepted may not be exactly zero, but
> >> they are certainly vanishingly small. I thought we'd agreed that a
> >> usable syntax would be like
> >> get_employee_salary(12345 AS emp_id, 2001 AS tax_year)
>
> > TODO updated, but I thought "=>" was the Oracle syntax.
>
> So? We don't support Oracle's brain-dead outer join syntax either.
We had reasonable problems with Oracle's outer-join syntax, while I
don't see the same fundamental issue with => vs AS, and PL/pgSQL is
patterned on Oracle's PL/SQL.
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +