Re: NLS vs error processing, again - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: NLS vs error processing, again
Date
Msg-id 200604201055.k3KAtmW06560@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NLS vs error processing, again  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-bugs
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I'm far from an expert on this, but the gettext documentation
> > indicates that it tries to translate the .po file contents into
> > whatever encoding is implied by LC_CTYPE.
>
> Correct.  That is just one more reason to have server encoding,
> LC_COLLATE, and LC_CTYPE matching.  In practice, there is hardly a
> reason to have LC_COLLATE and LC_CTYPE be different, so the problem
> should not be that big.

Is there any TODO here?

--
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PGSTAT: bind(2): Can't assign requested address
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #2400: 'Ã' considered invalid UTF-8character