Re: NLS vs error processing, again - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: NLS vs error processing, again
Date
Msg-id 200604051503.56309.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NLS vs error processing, again  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: NLS vs error processing, again  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm far from an expert on this, but the gettext documentation
> indicates that it tries to translate the .po file contents into
> whatever encoding is implied by LC_CTYPE.

Correct.  That is just one more reason to have server encoding,
LC_COLLATE, and LC_CTYPE matching.  In practice, there is hardly a
reason to have LC_COLLATE and LC_CTYPE be different, so the problem
should not be that big.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: NLS vs error processing, again (was Re: Composite Type
Next
From: "Brock Peabody"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #2371: database crashes with semctl failed error