On Wednesday 29 March 2006 21:23, Craig A. James wrote:
> Gorshkov wrote:
> > /flame on
> > if you were *that* worried about performance, you wouldn't be using PHP
> > or *any* interperted language
> > /flame off
> >
> > sorry - couldn't resist it :-)
>
> I hope this was just a joke. You should be sure to clarify - there might
> be some newbie out there who thinks you are seriously suggesting coding
> major web sites in some old-fashioned compiled language.
>
well yes, it was meant as a joke ..... that's *usually* what a ";-)" means.
That being said ..... what *is* the difference between coding a website -
major or otherwise - in an "old-fashioned" compiled language and a
non-compiled language, except for the amount of hoursepower and memory you
require?
Old-fashioned doesn't mean bad, inappropriate, or inferior. It's just not the
latest-and-greatest, however it's currently defined by the geek fashion
police.
