Re: PostgreSQL committer history? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: PostgreSQL committer history?
Date
Msg-id 20060309013825.B1178@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL committer history?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL committer history?
Re: PostgreSQL committer history?
List pgsql-advocacy
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> [ There is text before PGP section. ]
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>>> Right.  It is a case where the volume of patches just overwhelms us and
>>> we give them commit access.  It isn't "trust", and the only downside I
>>> see to commit vs. non-commit users is the delay in getting things into
>>> CVS.  The delay used to be 24-48 hours, but as my responsibilities have
>>> grown, the delay has grown as well.  I am not sure how to fix that.
>>
>> Delegate that responsibility to the others that have commit access. If
>> that's not enough, grant some more people commit access so they can
>> apply the already approved patches. And stop traveling all over the
>> world so much. :)
>
> The patch queues are open and committers are encourages to apply them.
> Neil and Tom do it sometimes.  I then remove the item and update any
> TODO entries.

Is it as simple as "if nobody objects within 24 hours, apply"?

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: TurboDBAdmin
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL committer history?