Re: - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re:
Date
Msg-id 20060227203834.A1005@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re:  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Responses Re:  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Jim C. Nasby wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:57:27PM +0000, Guido Barosio wrote:
>> Were do we finde accurate values, more updated ones?
>> Guess we should measure current values and compare them later, in a few
>> months after oracle  dbms war gets quiet.
>>
>> http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3462241
>
> "In our survey, 90 percent of our developers work with or deployed to
> Windows platforms," McKendrick explained. "Windows dominates this space,
> and a database that doesn't run on Windows or doesn't run effectively in
> Windows would have a fairly limited reach."
>
> Does that strike anyone else as being *highly* skewed?

Aren't most surveys, stats and benchmarks? :(  there is no such thing as
an "unbiased result" in statistics, it will always be skewed in some way
based on the person generating the stats ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: