Tom Lane wrote:
> "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
> > You'll still need to run the postmaster frmo pg_ctl to get the "run as
> > admin" part. The only part that could be moved is the Job Object for
> > management. And you're normally not going to need that one when you're
> > not running as a service. Maybe sometimes, but I doubt it's worth it. If
> > we could solve the run-as-admin inside the postmaster it might be
> > different, but AFAICS we can't.
>
> Yeah, I thought we'd agreed that the patch was fine as-is.
Fine. I just wanted to make sure the decions was being made in terms of
logic, rather than Win32 cruft avoidance. The previous discussion was
not clear on this point.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
