Re: Plans for 8.2? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: Plans for 8.2?
Date
Msg-id 20060116223037.GM67693@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Plans for 8.2?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Plans for 8.2?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 05:30:49PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >Why would you only recommend Slony? How does it compare to Sequoia or
> >p/cluster?
>
> Well p/cluster is not OSS. Sequioa is but is query based and doesn't
> correctly deal with things like now().
>
> I was speaking directly about OSS replication.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but AFAIK Slony is the only OSS replication
that isn't statement based, which as Josh mentioned has some serious
ramifications.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Unable to connect to a dabase
Next
From: "Qingqing Zhou"
Date:
Subject: Re: Huge number of disk writes after migration to 8.1