Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
> > > > Here is a small patch to prevent undesired WAL file caching by kernel.
> > > > posix_fadvise(POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED) attempts to free cached pages and
> > > > the kernel will discard them in preference to other data caches.
> > >
> > > On plenty of platforms, this won't even compile ...
>
> Yes, but we probably have to have a configure test to see if
> posix_fadvise exists too. I will keep this for 8.2.
I think we can use _POSIX_ADVISORY_INFO to test if posix_fadvise exists.
Also, I added the check on whether WAL archiving is enabled, because
archivers might use the caches to read the WAL segment.
By the way, should we put posix_fadvise on the separated place with renaming
pg_fadvise? If we use posix_fadvise in other purposes, for example,
read-ahead control, the separation would be good to keep codes clean.
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Cyber Space Laboratories
