Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> >> Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> >>
> >>> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I like this, but not because I want to read it myself, but because I
> >>>> want to make autovacuum responsible for re-allocating free space
> >>>> when it
> >>>> runs out. This way we can have an autoFSM feature in 8.2
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Not wanting to denigrate value of the interesting but slightly OT
> >>> direction this thread has taken - but does anybody want to
> >>> comment/review the patch itself :-) ....?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I saw this question about a transaction block and your reply:
> >>
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-10/msg00226.php
> >>
> >> but no new patch. I know someone suggested pgfoundry but it seems most
> >> natural in /contrib. Do you want to update the patch?
> >>
> >
> > In the expectation of further revisions, I was going to batch that one
> > in with the 'rest' - given that there have not been any, I'll submit a
> > revised patch.
> >
>
> Here it is - I seem to have had trouble sending any attachments to this
> list recently. Bruce the patch (sent privately), so its in the patches
> queue, but thought I would have another go at getting it to -patches so
> others can review it more easily!
>
> cheers
>
> Mark
[ application/gzip is not supported, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
