Re: Numeric 508 datatype - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Date
Msg-id 200512022044.jB2KiBl11091@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Numeric 508 datatype  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Numeric 508 datatype
List pgsql-patches
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > > Actually, no.  If I cut'n paste the number from psql to
> > > cat > foo
> > > <shift> <insert>
> > > then only 4096 chars are copied.  (Amusingly, I can't add a newline to
> > > ^D and close the file.  I must delete one char to do that.)
> >
> > Hmm, cut buffer limitation in X or someplace?  I definitely get the
> > right number of characters into the file written with \g, and what looks
> > like a reasonable number of screensful of plain psql output.  If Bruce
> > is seeing the right number of dashes and the wrong number of data
> > characters in his \g output then *something* is pretty weird there.
>
> Well, I just tried the \g test and it is correct (12675 digits or so).

I just tested from a standalone backend:

    backend> select pow(10::numeric, 131071) + 1

and got 4095 zeros and no trailing '1' (wrong), so it isn't psql, it
must be something in the backend.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype