Josh,
My pinch of salt about the usage of "enhanced" and "improved". You can also
used "better" and "superior". All those 4 words are synonyms.
IMHO, it is not too bad to use a certain word twice and I will let be like it
is.
Bernard
PS Hoping that my message will go through...I do not remember with which email
address I subscribed.
On Friday 07 October 2005 12:40, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Lance,
>
> > Only one nitpick. In the features section, we twice say the feature is
> > for 8.1. That seems implied to me. I recommend dropping the clause
> > "for 8.1" in "the buffer manager for 8.1 has..." and "in version 8.1," in
> > "in version 8.1, the query planner is ..."
>
> OK, I'll take a look. I'm a little more concerned about the fact that
> I use the words "enhanced" and "improved" at least 6 times each, and
> "refactored" twice. Bonus points for anyone who can find ways to
> replace some of these!
>
> Also, Lance, I thought I had an "about Pervasive" on file, but I don't
> seem to. Can you get me the 4 line version? Thanks!
>
> --Josh
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
