On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, mark@mark.mielke.cc wrote:
> I don't get a vote - but I do want to suggest, as a user, that I get
> generally annoyed with the presence of interfaces with names that
> were chosen for historical reasons, but are maintained only for
> compatibility, and either never did, or no longer apply.
>
> I'd rather you left it fixed. Returning it to the old name, for the
> sake of process, and no other good reason, doesn't appeal to me. It is
> a lesson learned. We move on. Enforce the process next time. Self
> inflicted punishment is somewhat masochistic. :-)
If we don't enforce the process this time, why would we enforce it next
time?
You either always enforce it, or never ... you don't pick and choose
though ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
