Re: [PERFORM] Query in SQL statement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: [PERFORM] Query in SQL statement
Date
Msg-id 20051004204343.GW40138@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PERFORM] Query in SQL statement  ("Roger Hand" <RHand@kailea.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 12:51:08PM -0700, Roger Hand wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org
> > [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Jim C. Nasby
> > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 4:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PERFORM] [HACKERS] Query in SQL statement
>
> > I suggest ditching the CamelCase and going with underline_seperators.
> > I'd also not use the bareword id, instead using bad_user_id. And I'd
> > name the table bad_user. But that's just me. :)
>
> I converted a db from MS SQL, where tables and fields were CamelCase, and
> just lowercased the ddl to create the tables.
>
> So table and fields names were all created in lowercase, but I didn't have to change
> any of the application code: the SELECT statements worked fine with mixed case.
>
> -- sample DDL
> CREATE TABLE testtable
> (
>   fieldone int4
> )
> insert into TestTable (fieldone) values (11);

That will usually work (see Tom's reply), but fieldone is a heck of a
lot harder to read than field_one. But like I said, this is the coding
conventions I've found work well; YMMV.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: mark@mark.mielke.cc
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Inherited indexes.